In this special contribution
to the web site, Doug Kibbey recalls his days with the Armor
Board at Fort Knox testing the laser range finder add - on for
the M551 and then visiting Fort Irwin many years later to
observe the last days of the Sheridan as the M551 VISMOD (visual
modification) program ended. Doug was also present when the
Blackhorse drew the M551s in Vietnam and is therefore in a
unique position to watch the circle close for the Eaglehorse and
the Sheridan.
Armor Board and the Laser Rangefinder
Doug Kibbey:
"As the 2/11th ACR stood down
and was withdrawn from RVN in early 1972, a couple of us had the
privilege to be assigned to the United States Army Armor and
Engineer Board (USAARENBD, the "Armor Board") at Ft. Knox where my
first duty was to join the Laser Rangefinder Project, which was
already in progress. This system was described by COL (Ret) Anker
in the previous chapter, and I can confirm one of his more
interesting observations, in particular the apparent ability to
displace birds from a perch with the laser pulse. There was
considerable training on this system, and we were monitored as
regarded the safety implications … the unknown regarding this
aspect is evidenced by the fact that those on the project had
monthly ophthalmographic photos of the retina taken to determine
if any scarring had occurred. On those days, we’d report to a base
ophthalmologist and have our eyes dilated and subjected to a
BRIGHT flash photograph of the retina that left one unsuitable for
duty for the rest of the day, so we’d try to schedule these early
for an easy day off."
"This was the first LRF system to be
employed on a production American fighting vehicle … as an
"add-on" component as was previously noted, and was essentially
the same as the integral unit first incorporated from the
beginning on the M60A2 ‘ Starship’, on which Initial Production
Test project I also served."
"The LRF project for the Sheridan
predictably involved a lot of live fire, normally conducted at
McFarland & Oliver Tank Gunnery Range well down Porter River Rd.
Additionally, the ability of the system to withstand operational
miles was tested, and included ‘X’ numbers of road miles,
unimproved (dirt) road miles, and cross-country miles between
firing sessions. Cross-country miles were accumulated unobserved
in the expanse of Carpenter Test Area, which was restricted access
in the NW quadrant of Ft. Knox beyond Cullen Maintenance Facility
and extending to the Ohio River, where we permitted ourselves a
fair amount of fun in the driving (bringing back a dry tank
commander was unofficially discouraged)."
"In the interim period prior to and during
service as OPFOR (( opposing forces )) VISMOD vehicles, the M551
was still serving operationally with the 82nd Airborne
Div. and was deployed in the conflict in Panama and to Saudi in
Desert Storm. Photos of the M551 on the streets of Panama with the
usual complement of sandbags and other accessory gear was
seriously reminiscent of Sheridans in Vietnam and I distinctly
recall a sense of déjà vu at seeing those images in the
press and on the news."
"We begin the final chapter and a lengthy
period of honorable service for the M551 that witnessed a
concurrent and then narrowed role as both operational combat
vehicle to enemy surrogate vehicle for force-on-force simulated
combat."
Force on Force Training Development, The
M551 Sheridan at Fort Irwin
"... the more you sweat in training, the
less you bleed in war"
Initially pioneered by the US Navy and
quickly adopted by the US Air Force in the early 1970s, the idea
of developing specialized squadrons schooled extensively in Soviet
air to air combat tactics was a huge step forward in the
development of highly realistic training programs. The threat
aircraft were configured whenever possible to both physically
resemble Soviet aircraft and also mimic their performance
characteristics. Each training engagement was fully tracked with
radar, video tape and audio tapes of crew transmissions to allow a
complete debriefing of the pilots on the ground at the conclusion
of the training day. At the high point of the program, the Air
Force had 4 dedicated aggressor squadrons with much of the
training focused at Nellis AFB. The US Navy maintained two
aggressor training squadrons, one in California and the second in
Virginia. The training benefit was seen as equally important in
both flying and fighting and then discussing mistakes made and
lessons learned.
The US Army was very interested in
adopting a similar program for maneuver training. As planners
turned away from Vietnam and looked to where potential
battlefields might exist beyond the plains of central Europe,
clearly, a new focus on desert warfare crystallized. Twice, the
world had held its breath, 1967 and 1973, as Israel and the
combined armies of Arab neighbors clashed. Both times, the
potential existed that the US might become directly involved in
response to Soviet aid to Egypt and Syria. Money and technology
began to come together as the National Training Center was
established at Fort Irwin California; the Army embraced a high
tech approach to both battlefield simulation and ability to both
track and then replay the battle in what became knows as the
"fight the battle - talk the battle" approach.
Key to the battalion level "force on
force" training was the use of the MILES, multiple integrated
laser engagement system, widely fielded during this period. The
system, now in a second generation form, allows weapons from the
M16 rifle through tank main gun to fire "bursts" of laser light
that mimic the ballistic characteristics of the firing weapon to
engage targets in free maneuver. Both vehicles and personnel are
fitted with sensors to register a "hit". If engaged by an
appropriate weapon, the "hit" vehicle or individual soldier is
rendered incapable of further participation in the fight until
"revived" by an umpire. The system was an enormous step forward
for the Army and remains integral to maneuver training today.
The Air Force mock up of Soviet fighters
greatly enhanced the training benefit for pilots, the Army needed
a ready platform for a similar program to make training at the NTC
as realistic as possible. Enter the Sheridan, just washed out of
the active inventory with the exception of the micro fleet at Fort
Bragg, a new mission for an old system. The Sheridans were
fitted with a variety of hull modifications to make them resemble
a vast array of Soviet weaponry, all were MILES equipped.
The National Training Center’s dedicated
training support unit, the 177th Armor Brigade was deactivated on
October 26, 1994 and then reactivated as the 11th Armored Cavalry
Regiment ( - ). The M551 VISMODs had been in active use since the
center opened in 1980.
Part 8: The New Mission, The M551 Sheridan
Reunited with the Eaglehorse
Doug Kibbey:
The following can be found as part of the
Ft. Irwin/11thCav/OPFOR online history:
"The 60th Guards Motorized Rifle Division
(GMRD), world famous as the oldest existing opposing force in the
Army on continuous active service, awaits its next victim.
The Opposing Force (OPFOR) was created to
provide a realistic, competitive and uncooperative force capable
of conducting free-play offensive and defensive operations against
the Army's Heavy Brigade Combat Teams.
The National Training Center (NTC) was
activated at Fort Irwin, California, on 16 October 1980. In June
of 1981, the 6th Battalion, 31st Infantry was formally reactivated
at Fort Irwin as a mechanized infantry battalion. This battalion
was formed from the 2d Battalion, 58th Infantry which was
deactivating. LTC Wissinger and a small cadre of his soldiers from
Fort Hood oversaw the shipment of equipment and LTC Wissinger
became the commander of the newly formed 6th battalion, 31st
Infantry. Fort Irwin was subsequently returned to active status as
an installation on 1 July 1981. These two units were activated as
Forces Command separate battalions and wore the FORSCOM patch. In
these early days there was no headquarters assigned to oversee the
operations of these battalions. The National Training Center's
Deputy Commander for Training had the "additional duty" of serving
as the commander of the OPFOR. Colonel William H. Reidl was the
OPFOR’s first commander. The last six months of 1981 were a very
busy time for the new OPFOR regiment. Some of their more notable
accomplishments included:
- Unloading, de-processing, and road
marching over 200 rail loads of both battalions' equipment.
- Conducting M551 Sheridan Transition
Training.
- Conducting Multiple Integrated Laser
Engagement System (MILES) training.
- Executing formal evaluation exercises (ARTEPs).
- Conducting Tank Gunnery for 1-73d Armor
in October.
- Completing six weeks of OPFOR training
administered by the Red Thrust Training Detachment.
- In November, both units received their
US equipment at the NTC equipment pool for use by rotational
units.
With all the required training complete by
mid-December the battalions of the regiment formed up together for
the first time in their OPFOR uniforms."
-Among the equipment mentioned in the
online history were eventually 300-330 M551 Sheridans. Over the
years, the M551 was used as an OPFOR vehicle visually modified to
serve as various models of the Boyevaya Mashina Pyekhoty (BMP),
the T-72, the 122mm SP Howitzer and the ZSU-23-4 SP anti-aircraft
platform. 1992 saw the introduction of the upgraded Sheridan
VISMODs altered to resemble the threat represented by the T-80,
and the introduction of the OPFOR Surrogate Vehicle (OSVs)
represented by the forerunner of the eventual replacement of the
Sheridan, M113 variants fitted with Bradley turrets. A number of
M551s were also stripped and painted to serve as umpire vehicles
during field exercises and with the introduction of MILES gear,
were equipped with what became known as the "god gun" which could
be used to activate the "killed" indicators for vehicles deemed to
have fallen victim to mines or other hazards. Over it’s lifetime
as a VISMOD vehicle, various materials were used to modify the
appearance, including plywood, sheet metal, fiberglass and plastic
pipes for gun extensions. High fidelity to the vehicle being
mimicked was not a priority, but at a distance the resemblance can
be quite convincing.
As might be expected, the organization,
focus, and equipment of the OPFOR at Ft. Irwin evolved steadily
over the years, and an excellent review of these topics and the
sequence of commanders is available online via Internet at the Ft.
Irwin website. Of more immediate concern here is the service
typical of units operating the M551 as a surrogate vehicle. With
the introduction/evolution of more sophisticated simulator
equipment (MILES I & II), there was a gradual loss of expertise in
tank gunnery using this platform and indeed, most of the more
recent Sheridan crews have never fired the 152mm gun/launcher.
Many of the Sheridans operating at Ft. Irwin did not have breech
assembly’s installed as they were not needed. In fact, the lack of
commonality with any other vehicle and the uniqueness of the
skills required to crew the Sheridan-based VISMODs became one of
the reasons for the conversion the OSV units, in addition to the
escalating maintenance problems and associated costs. Special
training to operate the Sheridans did not carry over usefully to
other vehicles and help maintain crew readiness for real-world
conflicts.
As the Sheridan became more dated,
maintenance problems became predictably more acute, and a credible
threat to more advanced equipment like the M1 Abrams family led to
the adoption of even some M1s as an advanced, unspecified,
potential enemy platform better represented by that vehicle.
Dubbed "Krasnovian Variant Tanks" (KVT’s) for the mythical country
that operates them, they provide some of the operational ability
lacking in the M551 VISMOD (speed, reliable stabilization, etc.)
A recent and regular participant of the
OPFOR with 1/221 Cav "Wildhorse" consulted for the preparation of
this feature shared the following insights of operations during
2003:
"It is important to think about how the
Krasnovian MIC (Mechanized Infantry Company) is organized to
understand how their "T80s" were used."
"A fully operational MIC has something
like 3 M551s (T80s) and 9 BMPs (M113s). The MIC almost always
operates with a CRP (Combat Reconnaissance Patrol) of 2 BMPs as a
screen for the main body, followed by the tank platoon and then
the APCs."
"Most MRC commanders would much rather lose two BMPs in the CRP
than their entire lead platoon when making contact with BLUFOR.
OPFOR is always seriously outranged, and outgunned by BLUFOR, and
they need the extra time to react and maneuver. The job of the CRP
is essentially to make contact, get killed and radio the BLUFOR's
grid location with their dying breath. The "T80s" are used to kill
BLUFOR tanks first, and then focus on the APCs, followed by
dismounts."
"Furthermore, the MIC cannot shoot on the move like BLUFOR can, so
more often than not when making contact, the entire MIC will stop
online and "volley" their fire with the M551s always focusing on
killing the M1s before they can be brought into the fight."
"The MILES II system allows a great deal of realism when in a
"laser fight". Not only do the hull and turrets have separate
armor values, but each side has different values as well. The M551
VISMOD does not have a laser range finder (and they would not be
allowed for use at the NTC if it did), so it is very important to
get a solid bore-sight with the MILES laser prior to any battle.
With a solid bore-sight you can hit anything between 1200 and 1800
meters center mass. Most engagements are at less than 2000
meters."
"Every M551 I have seen has always had a crew of 3 or less
(usually an E5 and two troopers). Since no loader is required with
MILES, more vehicles can be crewed with fewer men. I have at times
seen them crewed by only two. Me, I don't how they manage to fight
effectively with only a TC and a driver but they seem to do all
right."
"Probably the reason the M551 was replaced was because its engine
and transmission were so prone to breaking and we had exhausted
all of our replacement parts, and rebuilding them consumed too
much time."
That last comment is exactly right and
this observation was confirmed by officers and men at every level
during a visit in October, 2003.
The September, 1998 issue of
Soldiers-Online carried a feature on the mechanics of the NTC
and the OPFOR in particular and produced the following figures to
illuminate the requirements being made upon that specialty, and
not incidentally the load that continued use of the M551 Sheridan
was imposing:
- Average rotation: 10 days
- Annual rotations: 10
- Enlisted mechanics: 250
- Weapon systems: 2,000
- Radios: 1,200
- Generators, wheeled vehicles, etc: 2,800
- M551 Sheridan tanks: 180
- Sheridan wear and tear: 263 miles per rotation
- Engines replaced: 25-30 per rotation
- Replacement time: 8 hours per engine
- New Sheridan engine: $18,000
- Rebuilt Sheridan engine: $2,000 to $4,000
- New engine for M1 tank: $500,000
-Note that from the original figures of
between 300-330 M551s originally delivered, the numbers being
operated were down to nearly half that by 1998. As OSVs were
introduced into the inventory, Sheridans were being individually
retired. In another feature from Soldiers-Online in
November 1999, it was reported that the cost of operation of an
M551 had become double that of an OSV. During my visit to the NTC
in 2003, it was reliably reported verbally that more recently the
cost differential had risen to become more like three times that
of an OSV. Clearly the cost was becoming increasingly burdensome
and the crews operating them were not practicing the vehicle
operation skills integral to their primary training.
"Something is always broken," reported one mechanic in an article
"The
Unsung Heroes of NTC" who has been working on OPFOR
tanks for almost two years. "You have to understand that any time
these old vehicles stop, you have to start working on them or they
will break down." In most cases the OPFOR's 180 Sheridan tanks
are older than the men who drive them. "Let me put it this way,"
West explained. "I looked at the serial number on a tank I was
driving here. It was 000004 -- fourth one off the assembly line. I
bet the only Sheridan older than that is at the museum."
In the November 1999 issue of "Soldiers" this message was
echoed and the answer to the problems reported:
THE National Training Center's opposing force was in trouble.
Since its first rotation, NTC's OPFOR has portrayed the "enemy"
force by going into battle with modified M551 Sheridan armored
fighting vehicles that replicated the characteristics of tanks and
infantry fighting vehicles the Army is most likely to face in war.
The problem is that the Vietnam War-era Sheridans are getting old
and too tired to fight.
That's why the Project Manager-Training Devices (PM-TRADE),
headquartered in Orlando, Fla., developed a new OPFOR Surrogate
Vehicle and is delivering 160 OSVs to the 11th Armored Cavalry
Regiment, the NTC's OPFOR. OSV project director Scott Brookins
said the search for candidates led to several costly alternatives
before the drawdown of forces in Europe provided an economical
solution using excess M901 chassis that are part of the M113
family of vehicles.
"Using the M113 chassis, PM-TRADE developed a prototype vehicle
that resembled the Russian BMP-2, but more importantly, simulated
the BMP-2's weapons characteristics and troop-carrying
capabilities," Brookins said. The OSV made an immediate difference
within the 11th ACR.
"One of the key advantages we're seeing right now is the
reduced maintenance load," said MAJ Tim Hodge, the regiment's
force-modernization officer. "Soldiers spend a lot less time
repairing the vehicle, and it costs us about half as much per mile
to operate, counting both maintenance and fuel consumption," he
said. "So soldiers are saving time, the unit is saving money, and
we spend more time in the field."
SGT Matthew Garcia commands an E Troop OSV. His job is
navigation, supervising maintenance and making sure the mission
gets done. He's also in charge of three other vehicles, so he was
eager to trade in the M551s for the new OSVs.
"The best thing I can say about the vehicles is that they're
great for MOS - related training," he said. "Because they used
Bradley components to fabricate the turret, we're using our
Bradley skills while we're conducting a mission, and when we have
down time in the field I can train our gunners by staging mini-ARTEPs
with the other vehicles." Garcia also said that he likes the OSV
for the safety it provides his crews, especially because of the
night-vision capability, which wasn't available in the old
Sheridans.
"I have night-vision goggles and the driver has his night
sight, but now the gunner, with his thermal sight, can pick up
danger areas we might miss. I like that safety backup," he said.
"The thermal sight makes it much easier to acquire or identify
targets at night, but it also helps in daytime," said Garcia's
gunner, SPC Gregory Livingston.
"But it's the night fight where it really makes a difference.
With the Sheridans we had to use a spotlight or parachute flares
to identify and acquire targets. That would give away our position
and give the Blue Force an unrealistic advantage," he said.
"I also like the Bradley turret much better than what we had on
the Sheridan," he said. "Traversing is much quicker and you've got
stabilizers, which give you an advantage in rough terrain. You
might not be able to hit a target when you're moving fast, but
you'll be able to stay on it. And that's what matters."
It had become clear that continued use of the M551 chassis was
no longer cost effective, valuable training skills were being
wasted in the operation of an obsolete platform, and it was
beginning to affect the quality of the training available to
‘BLUFOR’ in facing a surrogate enemy with degrading technical
ability. The end was near … and inevitable. The last official OPFOR force-on-force rotations using the M551 came to an end as
2003 closed. At about the same time, there was a temporary change
in focus and training priorities at the NTC in response to a
developing operational environment overseas. In a masterpiece of
adaptation to a rapidly evolving situation, a curriculum designed
to better train units to deal with the scenario deemed COB,
"Civilians On the Battlefield" was implemented during which the
M551s were quietly parked. It was at this time that a number of
the photographs presented in the gallery were taken. In that
section will be seen VISMOD M551 "T80s" in full operational
configuration including MILES gear, vehicles partially stripped or
disassembled, and those that have been reduced to scrap. When
force-on-force training resumes at it’s regular tempo, the M551s
will not be among the OPFOR inventory, having been replaced by the
OSVs.
This marks the end of one of the longest operational histories
of any combat vehicle ever in the Army inventory.
Where are they now?
The M551 Sheridan has now been completely retired from any
official service duties with the only army in which it ever
served. A few good examples of the vehicle can still be found for
those wishing to view or research it further. These include the
outdoor display of the National Training Center at Ft. Irwin
(featured in the photo gallery); one in the Patton Museum of
Cavalry and Armor at Ft. Knox, KY; the display at the Airborne and
Special Operations Museum in Fayetteville, NC (also featured in
the gallery section) and one at the private Military Vehicle
Technology Foundation in Palo Alto, CA (special acknowledgment and
thanks to Mr. Jacques Littlefield for access to this vehicle for
the interior photos).
At least one example has recently appeared at the Latrun Museum
in Israel, having been shipped from the United States with fading
3/73rd Armor, 82nd Abn. markings.
Special thanks are due also to the officers and men of the
National Training Center, Ft. Irwin for access to the vehicles in
their service in preparation for this feature. |